Search for: "HONEYWELL INC" Results 81 - 100 of 413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Honeywell International, Inc., In the Court of Appeal of the State of California, F070761, (March 17, 2017) Robert D. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 8:46 am by Geoff Schweller
The actions, taken against ABB Ltd, a global electrification and automation technology company, and Honeywell International Inc., a U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:00 pm by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Honeywell International Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s finding that Solavay’s HFC patent was invalid under 35 USC § 102(g). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:14 pm by Kate Howard
Honeywell Technology Systems Inc. 16-521 Issue: Whether a debtor’s oral disclosure to the bankruptcy trustee of a pending administrative matter is material evidence of mistake or inadvertence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment on the ground of judicial estoppel in civil litigation arising out of the administrative matter. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 7:41 pm by Jon Gelman
A federal judge in Minnesota has ruled that Honeywell, Inc. can begin penalizing workers who refuse to take medical or biometric tests. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Dan Eller
Honeywell Int'l, Inc., Nos. 07-2494-JWL, 07-2498-JWL, 07-2499-JWL, 07-2501-JWL, 2010 WL 1284469 (D. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Honeywell Int’l, Inc., 706 F.3d 1351, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:23 am by Docket Navigator
"[I]t is undisputed that [plaintiff's parent] is [defense counsel's former] client, not a current one, and the Court is not convinced the [Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:51 am
Ghassemi had been indicted by a federal grand jury in San Diego in 2006 in connection with an alleged attempt by Ghassemi to purchase and export 12 accelerometers from Honeywell International, Inc. to Iran. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:56 am by Gene Quinn
Of course, the Supreme Court in Festo together with the Federal Circuit in Honeywell International Inc. v. [read post]