Search for: "HONEYWELL INC" Results 81 - 100 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2017, 8:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Honeywell prevailed in its appeal at the CAFC:Honeywell International, Inc. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am by Schachtman
Honeywell Internat’l, Inc., 66 N.E.3d 118 (Ohio Ct. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm by Michael S. Levine
Honeywell International Inc. et al., case number 078152, in the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey, noting the significant impact that choice of law could play on the outcome of that dispute. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm by Michael S. Levine
Honeywell International Inc. et al., case number 078152, in the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey, noting the significant impact that choice of law could play on the outcome of that dispute. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:52 am by Stephen Pitel
  The best explanation of this view is in Expedition Helicopters Inc. v Honeywell Inc., 2010 ONCA 351 (available here; see in particular para 24). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Honeywell International, Inc., In the Court of Appeal of the State of California, F070761, (March 17, 2017) Robert D. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:14 pm by Kate Howard
Honeywell Technology Systems Inc. 16-521 Issue: Whether a debtor’s oral disclosure to the bankruptcy trustee of a pending administrative matter is material evidence of mistake or inadvertence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment on the ground of judicial estoppel in civil litigation arising out of the administrative matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La requête en délivrance de la demande, déposée au nom de Hand Held Products (US), mentionnait le nom d'un mandataire agréé, mais avait été signée par un employé de Honeywell Inc. [read post]
7 May 2016, 9:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A press release notes:Google Inc. and Honeywell today [May 5, 2016] announced that they have reached a long-term patent cross-license agreement reflecting the respective strength of the companies' patent portfolios. [read post]