Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER"
Results 81 - 100
of 421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Pennsylvania, 13-885; Walker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 8:46 am
The Supreme Court activated the Second Amendment in Heller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
– Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O’Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News Blurred Lines v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:13 pm
McBryde, ‘Donoghue v Stevenson: the story of the snail in the bottle case' in AJ GAmble (ed) Obligations in Context: Essays in Hnour of David M Walker (1990) 13. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Although the dissenting opinion cites Bond v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
The most significant factor for the Court, which was referred to by both Lord Walker, giving the leading judgment, and Lord Hope concurring, appears to be that 75% of the funds paid by the LLP for the licence of software rights did not go to MCashback (even temporarily) but instead were immediately passed back by way of a chain of banks to the lender. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
These appeals from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance and Kerr. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:39 am
In Consbec v Walker, the Court of Appeal considered the case of Peter Walker, a former employee of Consbec Inc., a blasting and drilling company operating throughout Canada. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
Breaches of policy which directly bear upon detention vitiate authority for detention and sound in false imprisonment without more (even where the breach is procedural). 2.The test is material public law error (Lumba per Lord Dyson at §68; Kambadzi per Lord Hope at §§41-42; Lady Hale at §69, Lord Kerr at §88), not abuse of power in so far as that latter phrase denotes a more stringent test (per Lord Walker at §193 in… [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 pm
(Dale Carpenter) I’m still studying the decision today in Perry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
I hope this week gets even more exciting! [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:01 pm
Perry v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:32 pm
In the Bostock v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 5:07 am
Hope to see you on my tour!! [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Other coverage and commentary continue to focus on Monday’s oral arguments in Walker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 9:59 am
Perry v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:18 pm
The whole deal in the CAFC opinion in KSR v. [read post]
