Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER"
Results 121 - 140
of 421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Logically, it is enough that Walker is gay and may someday hope to get married, because such a judge still will benefit from that ruling. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Professors Kent Barnett & Christopher Walker argue in their piece, based on the amici curiae brief they filed, that the Court should not overrule Chevron in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
Walker, challenging Wisconsin's comparable ban. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Walker-Thomas Furniture. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Beaudoin, sitting as a judge of the Ontario Divisional Court, in the case of Walker v Hulse, Playfair and McGarry, 2017 ONSC 358 (CanLII). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Lord Walker dissents on the issue of justification. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:50 pm
In this regard, I think he's right about Rule 8, but wrong about Rule 3 -- and I'm fairly surprised by the failure of the opinion to discuss (or even cite) Walker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
Walker, Reference Librarian, Charleston School of Law [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm
In Midwest Ozone Group v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:27 pm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------LORD JUSTICE KEENEMRS JUSTICE DOBBS DBEMR JUSTICE WALKER R -v- JACK TURNER DANIEL-LANCE SAUMUELS Crown copyright ©1. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
The main judgments were given by Lord Neuberger and Lord Hope, which whom the others agreed. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:46 pm
The UKSC normally sits in five-member panels — here the panel consisted of Lords Hope, Walker, Neuberger, Clarke, and Collins. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:23 am
Isn't this part of their ongoing war against women, with the eventual hopes of enslaving them in baby-making factories? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
If he doesn’t like being approachedin the door jamb, step back into the hall.TORVIK: Well, I hope we can agree that assigning fault – other thanthe "a pox on both their houses" conclusion – depends on tiny littledetails that we don't have (which has always been Althouse's point, by theway). [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
Their Lordships (Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lord Mance and Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury) unanimously agreed that all three questions could be answered "yes", thereby dismissing the appeal. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 11:10 am
As with Collins v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
