Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER"
Results 161 - 180
of 421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2022, 12:18 pm
Ct. 1744 (2017), Walker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:06 pm
Lord Hope, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker argued that the difficulty of separating agreed fact from offer of settlement was such that the prospect would inhibit open negotiations between parties. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
Lord Hope also indicated that he would have considered the potential for an appeal to the Upper Tribunal curative of any breach of Article 6, following Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983) 5 EHRR 533, para 29; Tehrani v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2001] IRLR 208; R (Thompson) v Law Society [2004] 1 WLR 2522 There is one curiosity in the reasoning of Lord Dyson in that he seeks to dismiss concerns that the ISA does… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm
The civil cover sheet marked the case as related to Corbitt v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
Douglas Berman of the Sentencing Law Blog and Sarah Miley of Jurist note yesterday’s cert. grant in Walker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
However, a minority of three (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale) held that the breach of appellants’ fundamental rights should not be marked by an award only of nominal damages, although they reached no agreement on what the figure should be: see Walker at §195 suggesting an award of £1,000 each; Lord Hope at §180 suggesting something substantially less; and Lady Hale §217 suggesting £500. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
The three-day appeal in the case of AXA General Insurance Ltd v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) will commence on Monday 13 June 2011 and will be heard by Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
Easterbrook, Walker v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:54 am
" Defendants' counsel try to attack the analogy by Boies and Olson to Romer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Jackson Walker Blog-Tolerant Jackson Walker really surprised me that they promote their Twitter micro-blog, but make it difficult to find their "macro"-blog. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Indeed, just last term, in Gundy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:08 am
Let’s just hope that by the time all the legal wrangling is over, there is still something left in the judicial pension pot! [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:01 am
The reason for that prediction is the Supreme Court's crackdown on the Ninth Circuit last term in three important decisions: Walker v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
In John Doe 1 v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Proportionality seems to have been suggested by Lords Hope and Scott at least as part of the test, but the rest were mostly unclear on the point although Lord Mance and Lord Walker did suggest that any differences had been narrowed. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Walker, and Daniel Walters. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
I hope this helps! [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:47 pm
Sounds right to me; viewpoint discrimination is forbidden in a nonpublic forum, and this rule survives the Supreme Court’s Walker v. [read post]
