Search for: "HORN HOLDINGS, LLC"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state, then, in a markets privileging environment is caught on the horns of potentially incompatible objectives: the convergence of economic and administrative collectives around notions of compliance and state duty; or the promotion of risk taking in economic ventures to create prosperity and enhance the production of value that can then be tapped for all kinds of purposes. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
EXEMPTIONS Golden Gate Land Holding, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:32 am
bit.ly/KsDkB0 (Rees Morrison) The Rear View Mirror on Google+: Top 5 Stories From Last Week’s Unfiltered Orange Newsletter - bit.ly/KWFzuK (@OrangeLT) Total Cost of Ownership of Open Source Software | London School of Economics (PDF) bit.ly/K9bkVN (Maha Shaikh, Tony Cornford) Vision for Information Governance in Europe - bit.ly/K9eN6P (DLM Forum) Sight and Sound A Surprising Statistic: Do You Know If You Have A Legal Hold Initiated? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(Class 99) Component designs – General Court rules on informed user of a motor: Cases T 10/08 and T 11/08 Kwang Yang v OHIM – Honda (Class 99) Two stripes, three stripes and OUT: General Court decision in Case T-479/08 adidas v OHIM – Patrick Holding (Class 46) B&O speaker shape has appeal, so loses appeal: General Court decision in Case T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 99) General Court upholds OHIM’s refusal of PAKI as “contrary to public… [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Reno violation was based on clearly erroneous fact-finding; and (4) whether the majority erred in holding that strict scrutiny requires a legislature to adopt the least restrictive means possible for complying with the Voting Rights Act, instead of a redistricting plan that substantially addresses such compliance. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Food Lion, LLC, 14-110, has now been rescheduled a second time. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Wyeth LLC, 131 S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
” It’s like this: Plaintiff Richard Diaz, of Enterprise, Alabama, owns a trademark registration for this mark: Diaz sued Glen Plaid, LLC for trademark infringement for using this elephant design: The wrinkle is that Glen Plaid’s use of the elephant logo is pursuant to a license granted by the University of Alabama as part of Alabama’s “Houndstooth Program. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Whereas 2020 ended with hope for a return to some sense of normalcy – even if it was to be the much-vaunted “new normal” – 2021 ends with us still wondering about what the future holds and how to plan for it. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Whereas 2020 ended with hope for a return to some sense of normalcy – even if it was to be the much-vaunted “new normal” – 2021 ends with us still wondering about what the future holds and how to plan for it. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Since that time, however, Thomas has continued to report income from the defunct company – between $50,000 and $100,000 annually in recent years – and there is no mention of the newer firm, Ginger Holdings, LLC, on the forms. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The trial court sustained the Board’s demurrer without leave to amend, holding that the registration was exempt from CEQA as a ministerial act. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Further, as a limited-edition art object, the handbag holds value beyond its material components. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:07 pm
Yes, Greg Lambert 1:26 I had to hold your Lego Lego. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and predicted that the… [read post]
