Search for: "HOWES v. DUKES et al" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Supreme Court treats a case that already has a docket number with the Court, Phillip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:54 am
The theory of civil liability is that Duke is liable for the harm caused by this expression because Brodhead, et al., failed to stop these faculty members and students from engaging in this expression. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:25 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Maatman, Jr. and Laura Maechtlen As previewed in prior posts, we were honored by BNA's request that Seyfarth's class action practitioners author an analysis of the SCOTUS ruling in Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Mar. 28, 2013); Brief of Amicus Curiae California Employment Lawyers Association in Support of Respondents Sam Duran et al. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:51 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Background As previously discussed, in March 2013, the Western District of Tennessee, in Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2006, 12:19 pm
The case is called Campbell, aka Skyywalker, et al. v Acuff Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:58 am by Matthew Nelson
While the gaze of the eDiscovery community has been firmly transfixed on the unfolding drama in the Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
As usual, Orwell has it right; Bollinger et al. have it wrong. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Melissa Smith
Bouaphakeo, et al., No. 14-1146, a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) and a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]