Search for: "HOWES v. DUKES et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
ASRM et al. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
"Once again: Tyson does not challenge in any way the data that Arcidiacono, et al., presented, that black students at Duke disproportionately migrate away from more difficult (science and engineering) to easier (liberal arts) majors. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
May 25, 2006).Of the two contrary cases, Dukes v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:18 am
The latest ruling framing the "Dukes effect" is Easterling, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (awaiting from counsel) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-120 Title: Duke, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Thus, for instance, Epstein et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
Janice In a new order issued on November 13, 2015 in Brand, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:24 am
In a ruling on January 13, 2012 - in Scott, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:52 pm
DHS et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Behrend, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Windy City Innovations, LLC, Nos. 2018-1400 et al. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Matsuda, Mari J. et al., Words That Wound (1993). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
Via the Workplace Class Action Blog comes McClain, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
Among the cases the Court refused to review are the Duke lacrosse team scandal, involving police fabrication of evidence Evans, et al., v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
Ct. 2541 (2011), three named plaintiffs filed a third lawsuit against Wal-Mart entitled Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
Using data gathered by the university, Arcidiacono et al found that this narrowing was illusory. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:47 am
Stricker et al. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:35 am
In Bennett, et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
The fair use provision was used as an affirmative defense in litigation concerning the HathiTrust et al., and after much time and money spent in litigation, the court ruled, and the appeals court ruled, that HathiTrusts’s activity could be considered fair. [read post]
