Search for: "Hackney v. Hackney"
Results 1 - 20
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 9:39 am
In 2019 Hackney served notice to quit. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:22 am
Uddin v Hackney LBC (2023) J40CL175 Case Summary The Appellant approached the Respondent for homelessness assistance in August 2016, after he, his wife and four children had been asked to leave their home. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am
Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 8:16 am
He could not determine on the expert evidence that Dr Labinjoh’s decision to not prescribe the anti-inflammatory drugs was unreasonable or illogical under the test set out in Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 and as such, no breach of duty had occurred. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
That v-Lex and Fastcase have merged, now called v-Lex Group, is an important and certainly interesting development for customers on both sides of the Atlantic and far beyond, continuing a process in which the two businesses have been steadily advancing through acquisition and consolidation. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Gostin, Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade, (The Journal of the American Medical Association, published online January 28, 2022, at E1-E2). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
Temur v Hackney LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 877 applied. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Then the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm
(Patel v Hackney LBC (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note)) I see no reason to think it was wrong to do so, or that the reviewing officer in this case was wrong to do the same. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am
Readers may possibly recall the judgment in In R (Z & Anor) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor [2020] UKSC 40, which we noted at the time, here. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am
XXIV, 2022).Philip Hackney, Written Testimony for the Hearing on Laws and Enforcement Governing the Political Activity of Tax-Exempt Entities, (U.S. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:00 am
Philip Hackney: You can find my testimony on the Committee website and here on SSRN. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:22 am
In this post, Mathew Purchase QC of Matrix Chambers shares his views on the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Z) v Hackney LBC [2020] UKSC 40. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am
The House of Bruar admitted infringement of the Amira boot, such that it was only the Regina boot that was at issue in the recent judgment of Miss Recorder Amanda Michaels in Fairfax & Favor v House of Bruar [2022] EWHC 689. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Patel v London Borough of Hackney (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note) was also considered. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
Applying the guidance of Briggs LJ in Hackney LBC v Haque (2017) PTSR 769, the court held that: “there is a need to focus on specific aspects of the impairments, to bear in mind that the applicant would not be able to deal with obtaining a tenancy or to understand landlords, to focus on that, to focus on the disadvantages, to focus on accommodation needs, to recognise that the applicant’s needs might require more favourable treatment, and to review the… [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 12:58 pm
Patel v London Borough of Hackney (2021) EWCA Civ 897 A second appeal to the Court of Appeal, following a s.202 review decision and s.204 appeal on the issue of whether Mr Patel’s private sector accommodation from which he was evicted for rent arrears was affordable and hence whether Mr Patel was intentionally homeless. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 11:08 am
Perrott v Hackney London Borough Council, 29 Janaury 2021, Central London County Court (unreported – approved judgment here) and Perrott v Hackney London Borough Council, 29 January 2021, Central London County Court (unreported – approved judgment here) Two linked s.204 appeals arising from Hackney’s finding that Mr Perrot was not vulnerable for the purposes of priority need – upheld on s.202 review – and… [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am
(Akinbolu v Hackney Borough Council (1997) 29 HLR 259 and Birmingham City Council v Qasim & Ors (2009) EWCA Civ 1080 (our note)). [read post]
