Search for: "Hackney v. Hackney"
Results 81 - 100
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
In Shauger v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
The House further considered the case of Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 which found that the court has to be satisfied that the body of medical opinion relied upon has a logical basis. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm
In Alleman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:53 am
Commentary continues to focus on Monday’s ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:59 am
The applicant refused a placement in Dagenham because of the difficulties involved in attending training in Hackney. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:59 am
The applicant refused a placement in Dagenham because of the difficulties involved in attending training in Hackney. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:37 pm
If a body of professional opinion overlooks an obvious risk which could have been guarded against, it will not be reasonable, even if that opinion is almost universally held (Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:20 am
The District Judge followed Hackney LBC v Findlay (our report) and applied the CPR 39.3(5) checklist. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:20 am
The District Judge followed Hackney LBC v Findlay (our report) and applied the CPR 39.3(5) checklist. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
Khader v Aziz and Henderson v Hackney LBC: the value of the qualified privilege defence in defamation claims Anna Copeman (Denton Wilde Sapte LLP), Entertainment Law Review Ent. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:42 am
Justice Stevens also joined the majority when the Supreme Court further developed those limitations in State Farm v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:29 am
” On the other hand, proponents place undue and hackneyed reliance on a single 1919 case from Michigan, Dodge v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:38 pm
See Hackney v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:18 am
Whether or not this implies a roll-back from the frankly awful decision in Hackney LBC v Haque (our note), it does seem that the kind of generic phrases about the PSED one sees in decisions need to be at least followed through in the decision itself. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:38 am
On the inadequate reasons point, it was held that there is no particular form for the giving of reasons "… and having regard to the knowledge that [Ms Osei] and her solicitors could be taken to have had it was clear that sufficient reasons had been given for the agency's decisions" (applying R(M) v Hackney LBC [2009] EWHC 2255 - links to our note, see [35] of the judgment). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:38 am
On the inadequate reasons point, it was held that there is no particular form for the giving of reasons "… and having regard to the knowledge that [Ms Osei] and her solicitors could be taken to have had it was clear that sufficient reasons had been given for the agency's decisions" (applying R(M) v Hackney LBC [2009] EWHC 2255 - links to our note, see [35] of the judgment). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:47 pm
(In this respect, see also Islington LBC v A Rexha (2006) Clerkenwell County Court 6/12/2006 and Hackney LBC v Spring (2006) County Court 18/9/2006, although both of these cases concerned the County Courts Act 1984 and the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 rather than the Legal Services Act 2007). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
