Search for: "Hackney v. Hackney" Results 121 - 140 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The second judgment to be handed down is R (on the application of Z and another) (AP) v Hackney London Borough Council and Anr . [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:19 am by Juggalo Law
Outlaw is about as entertaining as a legal brief on the case of Wall v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 am
This form is often described with the hackneyed example of a frog not noticing that it is being slowly boiled. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 7:39 am
"  It's written by Michael Barrett.More on the 1987 Supreme Court ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:47 pm by Giles Peaker
The court of appeal notes that Din was decided when Rent Act tenancies were the norm, and relies on R v Hackney LBC ex Ajayi (1998) 30 HLR 473 and Knight v Vale RBC [2003] EWCA Civ 1258; [2004] HLR 9 on the question of whether occupation even under an AST could be precarious, deciding that it could be if it was clearly not going to be renewed. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am by Giles Peaker
McMahon v Watford Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 497 (and Kiefer v Hertsmere Borough Council ) We saw the approach of the Court of Appeal to the operation of the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in possession proceedings in Luton Community Housing v Durdana. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
(Akinbolu v Hackney Borough Council (1997) 29 HLR 259 and Birmingham City Council v Qasim & Ors (2009) EWCA Civ 1080 (our note)). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:39 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd -v- Grant [2006] This case has a rather confusing history, however it was basically about whether a mixed business and residential letting was a business one or a residential. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
The adopted definition of “taxi” means only Hackney Carriages qualify (reg. 4 of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions). [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am by Giles Peaker
 Applying the guidance of Briggs LJ in Hackney LBC v Haque (2017) PTSR 769, the court held that: “there is a need to focus on specific aspects of the impairments, to bear in mind that the applicant would not be able to deal with obtaining a tenancy or to understand landlords, to focus on that, to focus on the disadvantages, to focus on accommodation needs, to recognise that the applicant’s needs might require more favourable treatment, and to review the… [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
Another way of looking at this is that a commonplace design will be one which is trite, trivial, common-or-garden, hackneyed or of the type which would excite no particular attention in those in the relevant design field, see Ocular Sciences Ltd v Aspect Vision Care Ltd [1997] RPC 289, at p.429... [read post]