Search for: "Hackney v. Hackney"
Results 141 - 160
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Submissions on paper resulted in a first instance order that:‘Having considered the submissions on costs made by both parties and having regard to the principles referred to by the court in R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest LBC (2001) 4 CCLR 258 and to the caveat added by Hallett LJ in R (Scott) v Hackney LBC [2009] EWCA Civ 217 at 51 – to the effect that a judge must not be tempted too readily to adopt the default position of making no order for costs – I… [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Submissions on paper resulted in a first instance order that:‘Having considered the submissions on costs made by both parties and having regard to the principles referred to by the court in R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest LBC (2001) 4 CCLR 258 and to the caveat added by Hallett LJ in R (Scott) v Hackney LBC [2009] EWCA Civ 217 at 51 – to the effect that a judge must not be tempted too readily to adopt the default position of making no order for costs – I… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:37 am
See Rosenberger v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
***The majority's opinion is kind of a boring, hackneyed read. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
That v-Lex and Fastcase have merged, now called v-Lex Group, is an important and certainly interesting development for customers on both sides of the Atlantic and far beyond, continuing a process in which the two businesses have been steadily advancing through acquisition and consolidation. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:57 pm
AT&T and KSR v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:38 pm
In Issa v Hackney London Borough Council (1997) 29 H.L.R. 640, the court noted that the failure to update s.8 left tenants …wholly without remedy in the civil courts against their landlords, however grievously their health may have suffered because they are living in damp, unfit conditions… Likewise, in Habinteg Housing Association v James (1994) 27 HLR 299: We are told that the Law Commission has been considering such a problem. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
Hackney Jr., Morton Horwitz's Methodological Transformation: Some Musings on Transformations I and II PART II COLONIAL AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN LAW 9 Christine Desan, Beyond Commodification: Contract and the Credit-Based World of Modern Capitalism 10 Robert J. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am
CPR 39.3 applied, as the hearing that Ms P had not attended was a trial, but in any event 39.3(5) should be applied by analogy even if it was not a trial (LB Hackney v Findlay). it is strongly arguable that Mrs Pritchard did not apply promptly to set aside the order of 31st January 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am
CPR 39.3 applied, as the hearing that Ms P had not attended was a trial, but in any event 39.3(5) should be applied by analogy even if it was not a trial (LB Hackney v Findlay). it is strongly arguable that Mrs Pritchard did not apply promptly to set aside the order of 31st January 2011. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:16 pm
As it is put in Rahman v Sterling. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:16 pm
As it is put in Rahman v Sterling. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ… [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
Therefore, following London Borough of Hackney v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:12 pm
This was with reference to the judgment of HHJ Luba QC in Pavey v LB Hackney. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
