Search for: "Hardy v. Doe" Results 81 - 100 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 2:55 am
Heasley).The TTAB has (almost always) followed the principle laid down by the CAFC in Herbko v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
The court says the fact that Slocum didn’t display its trademark in the ad copy might be a problem: a potential client using the Bart mark to search for Bart will obtain a result that does not clearly indicate that it belongs to the Slocumb Firm and not to Bart. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although the complaint does not allege any cognizable pecuniary damage to decedent’s estate, plaintiff Hardie Stevens’s affidavit corrects that deficiency by identifying several categories of damages to the estate, including increased taxes and legal fees (see Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309-310 [2010]; Rudolf, 8 NY3d at 443; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm by Eric Goldman
However, as we saw with some of the infringing-app-name cases, Section 230 does a great job of screening out the para-IP claims so that the court can devote more energy to resolving the underlying IP questions. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:14 am by Gregory Forman
” I was unfamiliar with the Hardy case and typically look to the case of Hickum v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:07 am by admin
Hardy, M.D. 95 (1983); “Harriet Hardy’s Views on Asbestos Issues” (Mar. 13, 2013). [11] Richard L. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Ohio) does not apply to state court convictions which had become final before its rendition. [read post]