Search for: "Harmon v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
” The proposal for a new regulation would harmonize the rules on beneficial ownership and clarify essential aspects. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:48 am
Court of Appeals in Thaler v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
Harmon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
CommentAs stated, this is going to be a key referral for the (further) construction – and de facto unification (!) [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
Member States and public bodies like federal states or municipalities often impose various restrictions on, for example, pharmaceuticals, adult content, gambling, alcohol, weapons, among others. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The Executive Director revealed that Europol acted beyond its powers by processing large datasets from several Member States which included personal data of individuals not linked to a criminal activity. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:41 am
In particular, NAGR and Bevis point to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
As part of efforts related to international leadership, the EO also directs the Secretary of State to establish a plan for global engagement on prompting and developing AI standards. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 3:26 am
That was the question before the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta in Wirring v Law Society of Alberta 2023 ABKB 580 (CanLII). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
Cap Export, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
The report paints a picture of a harmonized but not yet quite harmonious EU trade secret landscape, where litigation trends are clearly visible but the practical differences between Member States still exist. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
In Hamilton v. [read post]
