Search for: "Harris v. Steele"
Results 121 - 140
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am
Shane Harris report for the Washington Post. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
President Harry S. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:09 pm
Young v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:35 am
Sawyer, in which the Justices rebuffed the president’s takeover of the steel industry. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Tingy (1800), Little v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am
” And Harris announced that her U.S. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:03 pm
In its extended analysis of jurisdiction, the Third Circuit drew on the Supreme Court’s decision in New Process Steel for guidance. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
One of the paradigm examples of “continuity v. change” in The Innovator’s Dilemma, and the example whose aftermath I’ve witnessed for the last 20 years, is the integrated structural steel industry in the US, headquartered in Pittsburgh. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
