Search for: "Harry J. Ferguson" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
  The bills would repeal the anti-trust exemption under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which makes insurance purveyors the only industry in America (other than Major League Baseball) exempt from federal anti-trust laws that prevent collusion and price-fixing.The hearing, which is being carried live on the web at 10AM from the Dirksen Office Building (Rm 226), has been given the snappy title, "Prohibiting Price Fixing and Other Anticompetitive Conduct in the Health Insurance… [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 6:55 am
Repeal of Antitrust Exemption for Health Insurance Industry Considered on Capitol HillThis posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 5:45 pm
Fletcher, Jerome Farris, Harry Pregerson, Warren J. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:53 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Seattle attorney Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm's China Law Blog Google Files "Photovine" Trademark for Social Networking Services - The blogging lawyers and attorneys at Mandour & Associates on the firm's blog, Intellectual Property News Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Who Pays Attorney Fees? [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Smita Ghosh
Schroeder (The Foundation of the CIA: Harry Truman, The Missouri Gang and the Origins of the Cold War); Emily C. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Robinson and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Special Agent in Charge J. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Jen Patja Howell shared this week’s episode of Rational Security, in which Tamara Cofman Wittes, Shane Harris and Susan Hennessey discussed L’Affaire Russe, U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mike Harris argues on Index on Censorship that a number of recent cases involving local councils “demonstrate the need to include a prohibition on all public bodies from suing for libel“. [read post]