Search for: "Hawaiian Gardens Casino"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2009, 6:46 am
Hawaiian Gardens Casino, the Second District Court of Appeal on January 22, 2009, held: (1) Labor Code section 351 does not prohibit tip pooling in casinos; and (2) Although sections 351 and 450 contain no private right of action, they do serve as predicates for actions under the Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Hawaiian Gardens, 170 Cal.App.4th 466 (2009), respecting whether the Labor Code provisions governing tips carry a private right of action. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Hawaiian Gardens, 170 Cal.App.4th 466 (2009), and the federal court holding in Matoff v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Hawaiian Gardens Casino [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Hawaiian Gardens Casino (2009) __ Cal.App.4th __ (Labor Code § 351 and Labor Code § 450 do not provide for a private right of action, but may serve as predicate statutes for suits under the unfair competition law). [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
Hawaiian Gardens Casino (2009) __ Cal.App.4th __. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 22, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) held that claims for violation of certain Labor Code provisions could proceed under the UCL's "unlawful" prong, even though the provisions themselves carred no private right of action. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:49 pm
Okay, well, maybe it wasn't an actual casino, or in glamorous Las Vegas; instead, it was the Bingo Club in the much-less-exciting Hawaiian Gardens. [read post]
