Search for: "Herman Miller, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2008, 3:56 pm
Herman Miller Inc., No. 08cv02977 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Herman Miller Complaint; Herman Miller Consent Decree [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:41 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
Herman Miller, Inc. in which the appellate court reversed some parts of a Central District of California ruling on trade dress and trademark infringement claims related to office chairs sold by Herman Miller, and affirmed others. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
Herman Miller, Inc. in which the appellate court reversed some parts of a Central District of California ruling on trade dress and trademark infringement claims related to office chairs sold by Herman Miller, and affirmed others. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 4:15 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:26 am
Would Herman Miller have been better off not trying to register the proposed mark? [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Herman Miller entered into a consent decree. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Herman Miller, Inc., No. 08-civ-02977 , 2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,454. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:14 am
Herman Braude (“Mr. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:36 am
The March 31, 2008 post reported that the New York, Michigan and Illinois attorneys general obtained a consent decree under state law against Herman Miller for its resale price maintenance scheme. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:58 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:26 am
May 18, 2021 - 11 AM: In re BFY LLC, Serial No. 88606855 [Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark MULTEEZ for "Homeopathic pharmaceuticals, namely, vitamins," on the ground of mere descriptiveness.]May 25 2021 - 1 PM: In re Herman Miller, Inc., Serial No. 88027008 [Refusal to register a three-dimensional product configuration of a chair on the ground of de jure functionality under Section 2(e)(5).] [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
PSKS, Inc., which held that RPM is no longer illegal per se, but is evaluated under the rule of reason. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
(Solon, OH) Jeffrey Conner Vice President Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary Dole Food Company, Inc(Westlake Village, CA) David Herman Senior Counsel Grocery Manufacturers Association (Washington, DC) Dean N. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:17 am
Herman v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:34 pm
Companies that participated in the road testing exercise include: 3M, Abengoa, Acer Inc, Airbus S.A.S, AkzoNobel, Alcoa, Amcor, Ampacet, Anvil Knitwear, Inc., Autodesk, Inc., Baoshan Iron & Steel Co. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
Herman, C055686 (Cal. [read post]
