Search for: "Hill v. Cruz"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in FCC v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:49 am
In Bowers v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
The long awaited decision in Brinker v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Court holds CSL §159-b requires employees to be paid for absences for cancer-screening examinations without charge to leave accruals - Cruz et al v Wappingers CSD Court vacates disciplinary action taken against a member of West Hempstead Fire Department after finding no substantial evidence to support the determination - D'Alessandro v West Hempstead Fire Dist. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:14 am
Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
For example, in Hill v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Several Northern California Judges have recently denied prisoner petitions for habeas corpus, among them: Hill v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:49 am
In Pineda v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Approximately one million dogs and cats enter California’s shelters each year, and over half of them are euthanized simply because there are not enough homes.SB 250, based on successful laws in Santa Cruz and New York City, provides a reasonable, fiscally-responsible step towards reducing pet overpopulation in California. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
In Kirby v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(City of Santa Cruz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
(AP / Times-Picayune / Lambda Legal press release) The case is Adar v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Cruz, 2009 U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Warley, Schechter Poultry v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Chestnut Hill, MA; Faina Teperman, President) Atlantic Auto Rental, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
De La Cruz, No. 06-1659, 07-2515 A conviction for drug-related offenses and denial of a motion for new trial are affirmed over meritless claims of error regarding: 1) a violation of defendant's speedy trial rights; 2) erroneous admission of evidence; 3) denial of the motion for new based on newly discovered evidence; 4) jury instruction; 5) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 6) whether the verdicts were against the weight of the evidence. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 am
In Hill v. [read post]
