Search for: "Holland Scientific, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence defines “risk” as “[a] probability that an event will occur (e.g., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:24 am
See McClain, 401 F. 3d at 1250; Hollander v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp., 295 F.3d 1194, 1201 (11th Cir. 2002); Hollander v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm by lawshucks
According to her LinkedIn Profile, Olivarius’s experience includes (emphasis added): Having initially developed corporate finance skills at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, her legal career includes service as General Counsel, CEO and Director of Scientific Programs of a medical foundation with assets valued at over $100 million (in 1991), and as a legal and strategic financial advisor for Perot Systems and Computer Memories, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm by Jon Sham
Schulman, said he heard through the grapevine that Electronic Arts Inc. had programmed a “retro” feature into Madden in which the Ravens’ uniforms bear Bouchat’s symbol. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
Roberts and Justice Stephen Breyer had recused in the case, undoubtedly because they owned stock in Cisco Systems Inc., the parent company of Scientific-Atlanta, according to their financial disclosure forms. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
Interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 702, Daubert ruled that modern judges now must serve as scientific “gatekeepers,” keeping out scientific testimony that is not “reliable. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Cynthia Holland-Tucker, an 11-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Kempf Contracting and Design, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 2016 WL 1448867 (S.D.W. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The question is not whether expert witnesses relied upon “scientific studies,” but whether their causal conclusions and claims are well supported, under scientific standards, by the studies upon which they relied. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
It is the scientific use of the imagination. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
New Holland North America, Inc., 440 F.3d 1002, 1005 (8th Cir. 2006) (applying Missouri law); Kinser v. [read post]