Search for: "Hologic, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am by Mandour & Associates
IPNews® - Smith & Nephew Inc. was awarded $4 million in damages on Tuesday for lost profits relating to Hologic Inc.'s infringement of its patents for a medical tissue removal device. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
San Diego -- Smith & Nephew Inc. won a $4 million jury verdict in Massachusetts federal court on Tuesday in its patent infringement suit against Hologic over a medical tissue removal device. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
SOCAN, Sirius, Canadian Satellite Radio Inc (Excess Copyright)   Chile Bringing down the baddies! [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal to register shape of temperature control device due to lack of acquired distinctiveness: In re Johnson Controls, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:56 pm
Indianapolis, IN - Patent lawyers for Tissue Extraction Devices, LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a patent infringement suit alleging Hologic, Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts and Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana infringed Patent No. 7,749,172, PNEUMATIC CIRCUIT, which has been issued by the US Patent Office. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:58 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The agency actually granted the approval to Massachusetts-based Hologic Inc., which presented the application and argued for the drug based on research by others. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1582 (Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Makena is sponsored by Hologic, Inc., based in Sunnyvale, California. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]