Search for: "Humanscale Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
Luckern issued the heavily redacted public version of Order No. 27 (dated November 4, 2009) granting Complainant Humanscale Corporation’s (“Humanscale”) motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement in Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems and Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Luckern issued Order No. 18 quashing a subpoena served by Respondents CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Corporation Ltd. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 3:21 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Luckern’s November 4, 2009 Initial Determination (Order No. 27) (“ID”) granting Complainant Humanscale Corporation’s (“Humanscale”) motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement in Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems and Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Humanscale Corporation (“Humanscale”) and the Respondents are CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Components Limited d/b/a CompX Waterloo (collectively, “CompX”). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:12 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Humanscale Corporation (“Humanscale”) and the Respondents are CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Components Limited d/b/a CompX Waterloo (collectively, “CompX”). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
The term "organization" includes corporations, partnerships, LLCs, associations and governmental agencies or other entities.In Humanscale Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by James Davis, Editor, HR Daily Advisor
With an increased interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs has come a renewed interest in corporate sustainability. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:26 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The Complainant in this investigation is Humanscale Corporation and the Respondents are CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Corporation Ltd. d/b/a CompX Waterloo. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:46 am
” Accordingly, ALJ Luckern denied CompX’s summary determination motion finding that “most every aspect of CompX’s motion is opposed by both [Complainant] Humanscale and the staff, and that genuine issues of material fact remain. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation was Humanscale Corporation (“Humanscale”) and the Respondents were CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Components Limited d/b/a CompX Waterloo (collectively, “CompX” or “Respondents”). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment on patent exhaustion and implied licence granted in part ExperExchange Inc v DocuLex Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Defence verdict in patent case in Marshall (and trial stats so far for 2009): Fiber Systems v Applied Optical (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Honeywell – ITC to review initial determination in investigation of import of certain… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
’: Tribunal Practice Notice 6/2009 Requirement to attend hearings in relations to applications for invalidation where there are grounds of invalidation under sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and/or 5(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (IPKat) Why automotive engineers don’t end up as patent infringers – Ian Hartwell reports findings of survey of UK and German engineering companies (IPKat) Web Sheriff takes on Jamie Oliver for dressing like member of The Village People without permission… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:41 am by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Humanscale Corporation and the Respondents are CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Corporation Ltd. d/b/a CompX Waterloo. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
- APRA to continue licensing music for public performances on condition it allows option of dealing directly with music publishers (IP Whiteboard) Sorbent brand success leads to trade mark victory (IP Whiteboard) Not complying with an injunction – FCA decision in Deckers Outdoor Corporation Pty Ltd v Farley (ipwars.com) Aussies drive logos, imagery from ciggie boxes? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in high-stake patent… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
Brooks (Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Nine year delay does not trigger laches but does preclude award of prejudgment interest: Humanscale Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]