Search for: "Hurt v. Department of Health and Human Services" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
  Because the FDA determines safety and efficacy as part of the pre-market approval process, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has determined that PMA devices generally may be covered under Medicare. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am by Wells Bennett
Instead, he wishes to be treated like a human being. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Big manufacturers that use energy efficiency to save on power costs told Kasich the law could hurt them. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
While the regulation expanded the set of those organizations that can avoid the requirement of providing reproductive health services, the Administration stuck to its original view, which is that women should be able to obtain these services under ordinary health insurance coverage. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Final SBC Regulations[*] implementing the Affordable Care Act’s summary of benefits and coverage requirements jointly published February 14, 2012 by the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (the Departments) will require most health plans and health insurers begin providing the SBC and Uniform Glossary meeting Department standards to covered persons and coverage applicants beginning on… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Final SBC Regulations[*] implementing the Affordable Care Act’s summary of benefits and coverage requirements jointly published February 14, 2012 by the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (the Departments) will require most health plans and health insurers begin providing the SBC and Uniform Glossary meeting Department standards to covered persons and coverage applicants beginning on… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:29 am by Sheppard Mullin
  Upon returning to work following her leave, plaintiff was assigned to a high-level human resources position in a different department that was specially created for plaintiff. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
Dear New York State Legislators: Deeply hidden from public view inside a report from the New York State Department of Health is a proposal to place an artificial $250,000 cap on medical malpractice pain and suffering claims. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm by WIMS
US Department of Energy- Chico Service Station, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:30 am by Eilionoir Flynn
This position outlined by the Office of the High Commissioner departs from the case law of the European Court on Human Rights on Article 5. [read post]