Search for: "I V" Results 1 - 20 of 151,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am by Family Law
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:02 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Yesterday, I posted an entry about Justice Scalia accusing the majority in Michigan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:59 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0069, 2010 MT 274, MM&I, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Some of you might remember an AWA case in Florida that I blogged about some time ago: People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
Regina v I (C) and others; [2009] WLR (D) 286 “A judge who had conducted the case management of a long or complex case, whether or not as a preparatory hearing, had to conduct the trial in that case unless there were sufficiently compelling cause to depart from that rule. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:40 am by buslawblogger
As I reported last week, the Supreme Court of Delaware decided CML V, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am by sally
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public security’ pursuant to… [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
I looked at every time CAAF has cited Jackson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:22 am by sally
Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmynidigheten C-30/10; [2011] WLR (D) 44 “A provision of national law which excluded an employee from entitlement under the guarantee of payment of employees’ outstanding claims in the event of their employer’s insolvency, on the ground that the employee within the six months preceding the application for a declaration of insolvency had been the owner of an essential part of the… [read post]