Search for: "I.C. System" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In determining that the sewer system development charges and connection fees paid by a developer or builder and not by the retail customer were not subject to the URT, the court examined I.C. 6-2.3-1-4 and I.C. 6-2.3-3-10. [read post]
In determining that the sewer system development charges and connection fees paid by a developer or builder and not by the retail customer were not subject to the URT, the court examined I.C. 6-2.3-1-4 and I.C. 6-2.3-3-10. [read post]
In determining that the sewer system development charges and connection fees paid by a developer or builder and not by the retail customer were not subject to the URT, the court examined I.C. 6-2.3-1-4 and I.C. 6-2.3-3-10. [read post]
Part of NIPSCO’s TDSIC plan included certain system deliverability projects, specifically NIPCO’s need to upgrade its Marktown substation and improve the distribution and transmission related system deliverability in the Nappanee area. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 5:59 am
Our comments and analysis relate primarily to the request for comments in Sections I.C.2, II.D, and III.D of the Proposal. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 pm by slemberg
Rothman notified Allied Interstate, AllianceOne, Bureau of Collection Recovery, I.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 5:45 am by Michelle O'Neil
In re Marriage of I.C. determined that a clause allowing for forfeiture of all rights under a premarital agreement if a spouse challenged the agreement was a valid and enforceable provision. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
In such a case, the use feature is a functional process feature comparable in category with the other features (steps) of the process (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, I.C.8.1.3 c); T 848/93, point 3.2 of the Reasons). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
In such a case, the use feature is a functional process feature comparable in category with the other features (steps) of the process (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, I.C.8.1.3 c); T 848/93, point 3.2 of the Reasons). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover, the general teaching of document D14 is clearly directed at the parallel treatment of several samples in devices that are adapted to microtitration systems […]. [read post]
29 May 2022, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
I.C., decided Friday by the California Court of Appeal (in an opinion by Presiding Justice Frances Rothschild, joined by Justices Victoria Gerrard Chaney and Helen Bendix): Father appeals the family court's order granting Mother's request that M.W. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
D23 and D24 disclose “SMART” roller segments developed by VAI as well as the “ASTC” control system. [read post]