Search for: "ICON Health & Fitness Inc " Results 81 - 100 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2015, 6:23 am by Tim Sitzmann
Icon Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court rejected these heightened standards. 134 S.Ct. 1749 (2014). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., the Supreme Court also rejected the “rigid” two-part Brooks Furniture test, holding that “an ‘exceptional’ case [warranting attorney fees] is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:34 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1749 (2014) and Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, a 2009 case in which they determined that attorney's fees may be awarded in cases of bad faith. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379-80 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:16 am by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. for imposing attorney fees under the similarly-worded 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:46 am by Melissa Barnett
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., the issue on appeal was what constitutes an “exceptional case,” which would allow a district court to award attorney fees to the prevailing party. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 2:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:07 am by Daniel Nazer and Daniel Nazer
The Court has granted certiorari in six patent cases this term, including Octane Fitness v Icon Health (fee-shifting) and Alice Corp. v CLS Bank (abstract software patents). [read post]