Search for: "IN RE RITCHIE" Results 21 - 40 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2008, 9:31 am by Mark Cohen, editor
No matter what happens with this recount (and I have every confidence that Secretary of State Mark Ritchie will do all he can to make it as clean as possible), the race will provide the political blogosphere conspiracy-theory fodder for many years to come.Conspiracy theories aside, our imperfect system of paper ballots and scanning technology with recounts by hand is just not set up well for elections this close. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:21 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Hidive LLC, Serial No. 87819793 (January 24, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:46 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Antonio F. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:33 am
" In re Leiper’s Fork Distillery, LLC, Serial No. 86894726 (May 14, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).Leiper's Fork, a rural village in Tennessee with a population of 650 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:19 am
In re Schalk, Serial No. 86183499 (October 10, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).Once again, the question for the Board was whether the public would perceive the purported mark as a source indicator for the identified goods. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
And this is an example of poor leadership.[10]These comments were part of a script for the call that was reviewed by Lance Tucker, the Company's then-Chief Financial Officer, and Steve Ritchie.[11] Ritchie asked Schnatter not to make comments regarding the NFL during the [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Unfortunately, the M25 is already at a standstill, so no one notices.October - Madonna reveals that, contrary to previous reports that suggested she only paid £200 million, she actually paid Guy Ritchie her entire £300 million fortune.November - In Re: A Family Lawyer (Shoe Condition) Mr Justice Munby issues a warning to family lawyers about their failure to polish their shoes before attending court.December - The BBC launches its new legal-reality series, The… [read post]
15 Sep 2006, 1:23 am
See In re Old Glory Condom Corp., 26 USPQ2d 1216 (TTAB 1993) [note 3].Therefore, because Opposer McDermott failed to plead a proper Section 2(a) claim and because he failed to establish the requisite standing to oppose, the Board dismissed the opposition.TTABlog note: See other pertinent TTABlog postings here, here, here and here.]You will recall that in Ritchie, the CAFC ruled that Ritchie had standing to oppose certain trademark applications filed by O.J. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
In re Fulfill Food and Beverages, LLC, Serial No. 76719598 (July 13, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).The Marks: The word KARUNA is the dominant portion of applicant's mark, said the Board. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:38 am
In re Four Seasons Hotels Ltd., 987 F.2d 1565, 26 USPQ2d 1071 (Fed. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 6:48 am
“We really want to make sure that we have all of our stakeholders around the table when we’re thinking about not just the Rules of Professional Conduct, but also what lawyers’ responsibilities are in any one circumstance,” says Anand.The law faculty hosted a panel discussion on March 5 with Ontario Superior Court Justice Michael Code; Lawrence Ritchie, executive vice president and senior policy adviser at the Canadian Securities Transition Office; Torys LLP… [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:07 am
In re Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc., Serial No. 86423483 (May 11, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Ritchie).Examining Attorney Kathy Wang contended that PPL is an acronym for "pre-paid legal" services, which is a feature of characteristic of applicant's services. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:11 am
In re Coscentra B.V., Serial No. 79196465 (March 26, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).Of course, because the goods are in-part identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:05 am
In re Chang, Serial No. 87503270 (June 12, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie].Since the involved services are "legally identical," they are presumed to travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of consumers. [read post]