Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF v. DP"
Results 1 - 20
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2016, 11:12 pm
The investigation report cannot form part of the employer’s standard disciplinary procedures. [1] [2016] FWC 605. [2] Kirkman v DP World Melbourne Limited [2015] FWCFB 3995, reversing the decision of Bissett C in Kirkman v DP World Melbourne Limited [2015] FWC 2563. [3] Kirkman v DP World Melbourne Limited [2016] FWC 605. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Anderson v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
Please see Santa Singh v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:25 pm
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:25 pm
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:24 am
Employee terminated following positive random test for illegal drugsMatter of Randall Rice v Thomas Belfiore, 15 Misc.3d 1105A disciplinary action was instituted after Randall Rice, a police officer with the County's Department of Public Safety [DPS], tested positive for marijuana after a random drug test.* A ten-year DPS veteran, Rice also served as senior technician of a six-member bomb squad. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:20 am
Employee terminated following positive random test for illegal drugsMatter of Randall Rice v Thomas Belfiore, 15 Misc.3d 1105A disciplinary action was instituted after Randall Rice, a police officer with the County's Department of Public Safety [DPS], tested positive for marijuana after a random drug test.* A ten-year DPS veteran, Rice also served as senior technician of a six-member bomb squad. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:10 am
Somebody from the back cried out, "Have you ever heard of Brady v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
"V. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
The Board also set forth (point 5.4) that, on the basis of the minutes of the oral proceedings in examination, it was at least implicit during the oral proceedings, and should have been known to the applicant, that both D1 and D2 were considered as "closest prior art".V. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 2:36 pm
Edison Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:59 pm
Minor accomplices who neither kill nor intend to kill are protected by a federal constitutional rule, Enmund v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 1:31 am
Sierra Forest Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
"V. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
But Hibbs said a case styled Holder v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:46 pm
The last several days have seen a flurry of activity in the federal courts in matters involving the Endangered Species Act (ESA): In Crown Indian Tribe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:38 am
On February 2, 2011, discovery and other pre-trial matters were heard at the Yorktown Courthouse in the medical malpractice case of Marshall v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:15 pm
The matter was again remanded to FWS to complete a new finding. [read post]
