Search for: "IPR Licensing Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
USA, Inc., No. 2022-1258 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm
DexCom and Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. entered into a settlement and license agreement in 2014, following years of patent litigation over their competing glucose monitoring system patents. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm
DexCom and Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. entered into a settlement and license agreement in 2014, following years of patent litigation over their competing glucose monitoring system patents. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:15 am
At the PTAB, Hyundai filed two new IPRs against Mel Navip LLC [associated with Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC] patents; Fortinet Inc. filed two IPRs against one Lionra Technologies [associated with Magnetar Capital] patent; and Apple filed two IPRs against DoDots Licensing Solutions [Strategic Intellectual Solutions] patents. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:15 am
At the PTAB, Hyundai filed two new IPRs against Mel Navip LLC [associated with Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC] patents; Fortinet Inc. filed two IPRs against one Lionra Technologies [associated with Magnetar Capital] patent; and Apple filed two IPRs against DoDots Licensing Solutions [Strategic Intellectual Solutions] patents. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In Sur-Replies filed late last week in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, Urban Intel, Inc. told the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that threats made by ASSA ABLOY Global Solutions “to file IPR petitions and a declaratory judgment action unless granted a free license to three valuable patents,” among other allegations, “runs directly counter to the purpose and goals of the post-grant administrative challenge system. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In Sur-Replies filed late last week in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, Urban Intel, Inc. told the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that threats made by ASSA ABLOY Global Solutions “to file IPR petitions and a declaratory judgment action unless granted a free license to three valuable patents,” among other allegations, “runs directly counter to the purpose and goals of the post-grant administrative challenge system. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:28 pm
Palette Life Sciences, Inc., No. 21-2063 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
Electronic Scripting Products, Inc., IPR2019–00062, –00063, –00084, 2019 WL 1490575 (PTAB Apr. 2, 2019) (precedential)); Petitioners requesting IPR of a patent that previously joined an IPR proceeding directed to the same patent (see Valve Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
Electronic Scripting Products, Inc., IPR2019–00062, –00063, –00084, 2019 WL 1490575 (PTAB Apr. 2, 2019) (precedential)); Petitioners requesting IPR of a patent that previously joined an IPR proceeding directed to the same patent (see Valve Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
One such company is GenghisComm Holdings, which on Wednesday filed a SEP infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas against Toyota: When it comes to comparable licenses, Toyota will be able to point to the license it has taken from Avanci, paying $15 per car for the vast majority of 4G SEPs. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
According to Arete, Apple paid an estimate of $225 million per year under the old agreement "[s]ince losing Apple in the mix took Ericsson IPR payments down from SEK 8.1bn for ’21 (when Apple was a 4G licensee) to a run-rate of SEK 5.75bn [in the aggregate of the first three quarters of 2022]. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
” Shortly after, the same reasoning would be echoed in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:45 pm
(the 'Company') renewed a patent license agreement with Apple, Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
Full Scope Enablement in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
This week saw more Express Mobile, Inc. institutions at the Board, suggesting that, of the five rather widely asserted assets (hundreds of suits against hundreds of defendants), all five are likely invalid for various reasons. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
This week saw more Express Mobile, Inc. institutions at the Board, suggesting that, of the five rather widely asserted assets (hundreds of suits against hundreds of defendants), all five are likely invalid for various reasons. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In district court, the problem is that juries rarely consider patents invalid, so you depend on a stay pending a parallel PTAB IPR proceeding.But how would Apple get a PTAB IPR instituted? [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm
Von Langsdorff Licensing Ltd., 851 F.2d 1387, 1392 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:15 am
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
