Search for: "IPR Licensing Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple Inc., No. 16-483 (Can the Federal Circuit review USPTO decision to initiate an IPR on a ground never asserted by any party) Licensing: DataTreasury Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Wildcard Systems, Inc., et al., No. 17-1483 (when does a breach of patent license case get to Federal Court?) [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 11:53 am
AstraZeneca also paid $50-million to AtheroGenics Inc. last year to license its atherosclerosis drug candidate AGI-1067, which is now in late-stage clinical trials, with promises of another $950-million if the drug wins regulatory approval. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Petitions for Writ of Certiorari Denied or Dismissed: Licensing: DataTreasury Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 6:47 am
Where an IPR holder has voluntarily undertaken to license its IPR on FRAND terms it irrevocably commits itself to allow the standards to be implemented under its IPR and thereby waive its legally defined right to exclude others from practising the standard under its IPR. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
– Seattle, WA American Honda Motor Company, Inc. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
But the dynamics changed late in 2004, when Electronic Arts entered into an exclusive, five-year agreement with the National Football League and Players Inc., the licensing and marketing subsidiary of the N.F.L. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 16-332 (effectively extending exclusivity to 12 1/2 years; complement to the Sandoz petition) Licensing: DataTreasury Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Gnosis S.p.A., et al., No. 16-125 (standard of appellate review of PTAB fact-finding in IPR proceedings) Post Grant Admin: Automated Creel Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]