Search for: "IS Shaped Design Co., Ltd." Results 21 - 40 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2015, 1:57 am
Last year the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) remitted to the General Court Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P Pi-Design AG, Bodum France SAS and Bodum Logistics A/S v OHIM, Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:12 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied Respondents Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:07 am
The Trademark Trial And Appeal Board ("TTAB") issued a ruling in In re Right-On Co., Ltd., affirming the examining attorney's refusal to register Right-On's three trademark applications, covering stitching on the back pockets of jeans, because they were a form of ornamentation and were not inherently distinctive to function as trademarks. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
But in Magmatic Ltd v PMS International Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 181, PMS has won its appeal to the Court of Appeal.RCDs protect any aspect of the appearance of the whole or a part of a product resulting from its lines, contours, colour, shape or texture or the materials of which it is made. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
The TX1/TXII mark was a UKTM registered for cars, the shape which was its subject was also protected as a registered design. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Although there are 7 representations, the main features can be seen in 3 drawings: The unregistered designs relied upon are:  (a) the whole of the Heeled Regina boot (essentially the same as the RCD); and (b) the Heeled Regina boot with the back panel/gusset area excluded; and (c) the Heeled Regina boot with the back panel and part of the inner side of the boot excluded:Fairfox & Favor relied on seven features of the unregistered design of the Heeled Regina as follows:the… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
is the standard by which design infringement is measured, copyright only requires a finding that a substantial part of a work has been copied, whether the respective works look similar or not.Lambretta Clothing Co Ltd v Teddy Smith (UK) Ltd and another [2004] EWCA Civ 886 (noted here by the IPKat) was the next case to receive Simon's attention, when he asked whether design law protects a combination of colours in the absence of shape (no, said… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Also mentioned was the tdecision issued by the District Court of the Hague in the consolidated cases Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Maxperian NL BV and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Digital Revolution BV [ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:14383, para 4.74], which held that toner cartridges can be protected under Community Design rights because they are not component parts of a complex product (MARQUES Class 99 post).Common practice for LOC and signs with… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:04 pm
Plaintiff’s and defendants’ jewelry designs In Cosmos Jewelry, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:14 am
The Board rejected applicant's contention that the evidence must show other diamond patterns, pointing out that even if applicant's is the first and only user of a diamond pattern, that fact alone "does not imbue the design with source-identifying significance, where Applicant's design merely repeats an ordinary shape in an unremarkable pattern and places it on the goods in an unremarkable way. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
 Upon discovery of these and various other related cup designs George East again objected and ultimately issued proceedings for passing off in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) in London: George East Housewares Ltd v Fackelmann Gmbh & Co KG & Anor [2016] EWHC 2476.The get-up - interiorIn a passing off case, there are three issues which the court needs to determine (the so-called classic Trinity):1 Does the claimant have goodwill (and if so… [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Birrs LJ also ventured further than this and asserted that the court can determine the validity of a foreign patent if it is relevant to the enforcement of the contract in Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd v GW Pharma Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1462. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
Ltd v EUIPO dealt with the registration of a trademarks for the design of a knife handle by Yoshida (marks 1371244 and 1372580), which comprised of a metal handle with black dots in the handle (signifying circular indents in the metal). [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
KG v EUIPO dealt with a registered trademark for the design of the Rubik's Cube (No. 162784), which is owned by Seven Towns Ltd. [read post]