Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness"
Results 81 - 100
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:14 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., was the primary decision simply because that case was treated first by the Court and formed the basis of the Court’s decision in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:46 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., (S.Ct. 2014), an exceptional case in which the court may, in its discretion, award attorney’s fees is simply one that “stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. attorney’s fees awards are becoming more common in patent cases. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Icon Health and Fitness and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
” In re ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:47 am
" Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:20 am
by Dennis Crouch Icon Health and Fitness v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:20 am
by Dennis Crouch Icon Health and Fitness v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Laws can pass that test, known as “strict scrutiny,” only if there is a close fit between a critical government interest and the means used to achieve that interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:02 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Docket No. 12-1184; Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on April 29, 2014. [read post]
4 May 2014, 3:14 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:21 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1749 (2014)] and [Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:50 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:59 am
" Icon Health & Fitness v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:30 am
New York Road Runners New York Road Runners, founded in 1958, is dedicated to promoting the sport of distance running, enhancing health and fitness for all, and responding to community needs. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, a 2009 case in which they determined that attorney's fees may be awarded in cases of bad faith. [read post]
