Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 8:52 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:52 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., which dealt with a similar two-part test created by the Federal Circuit in Brooks Furniture dealing with reasonable attorney fees. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct 1749, 1753 (2014). [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct 1749, 1753 (2014). [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. broadened the “exceptional case” rubric used to determine when an award of attorney fees is appropriate in a district court patent dispute. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:39 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 1749 (2014) (relaxing the test for attorneys’ fees awards in patent cases), the Court determined that the Seagate test improperly insulated a patent infringer’s subjective bad faith behind a threshold test of the objective strength of the infringer’s case. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:15 pm
Cir. 2000))); Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., Octane had been sued by ICON for infringing on ICON’s patent for adjustable elliptical machines. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
Meanwhile, David Berry, writing for PatLit, discusses Octane Fitness LLC v ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., urging the court to make it easier for prevailing defendants to get attorney's fees in patent cases. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:49 am
Here, court found the reference reasonably pertinent, and as a result affirmed the finding of obviousness.More detail of In re Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. after the jump. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
Allcare Health Management System Inc. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:06 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., the Court defined an “exceptional” case entitled to fee-shifting to be “simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm
See, e.g., Icon Health & Fitness,Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:05 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, 134 S. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:05 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, 134 S. [read post]
