Search for: "Imperial Oil Limited" Results 21 - 40 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 2:27 pm by Jeanette Lee
However, Imperial Oil is a long-time sponsor of Hockey Canada, who runs Canada’s national hockey team programs. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
and taxes combating poverty education improving business climate (for domestic and foreign enterprises) motivating the unemployed (out of necessity vacancies now filled by foreign employees) health care the political system (currently there are way too many parties) Curacao's future relationship with The Netherlands crime & prison issues social security & seniors families & children environment (improving or selling oil refinery) It is a long list and the… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Imperial Oil v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 12:24 pm
You'll see that Arbitrator Kaplan references a leading case of Arbitrator Picher in Imperial Oil that was judicially reviewed and, in fact, recently made its way to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
All three were defendants in the Kiobel litigation.[8] Although obviously profitable, SPDC’s operations in Nigeria faced challenges including rampant corruption and military dictatorships.[9] The mine site is located in the ecologically sensitive area of the Niger Delta, one of the worlds largest wetlands, covering 20 000 square kilometers.[10] Given the value of the rich oil deposits, environmental protection took a back seat, and the Nigerian state was quick to implement measures to… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by James Hamilton
Further, since there are only a limited number of audit firms large enough to audit companies like Imperial Oil, mandatory rotation, based on arbitrary points in time could limit the availability of qualified firms, placing the audit committee in an unacceptable position. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:59 pm
 Thus, the case could be of limited relevance in the common law provinces. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
As the Supreme Court has noted, the polluter pays principle “has become firmly entrenched in environmental law in Canada”: Imperial Oil Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Imperial Oil Ltd., 1996 CanLII 4042 (FCA)) and a grant of punitive damages for breach of an injunction (Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 6:06 pm
And as for the expectation that a civilized state, even one with imperial ambitions, will not long tolerate such a leader--well history has proven Mr. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:17 pm by Mark Weidemaier
Very roughly speaking, Russia wants regional influence, China wants oil, and the US wants regime change (ideally, while limiting Russian and Chinese influence in the region). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:27 am by admin
The BCUC found, among other things, that four oil companies (Parkland Fuel Corporation, Suncor Energy Inc., Imperial Oil Limited and Shell Canada Limited) collectively controlled about 88% of the wholesale gasoline and diesel supply in British Columbia, that the level of concentration in the market met the technical definition of an oligopoly and that the defendants possessed market power. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:34 am
Some interesting voices from the participants: “There’s been state censorship ever since there’s been states” We should be more interested in the commercial censorship (such as through copyright) than that by states: “IP is the oil of the 21st century”. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:07 am by Paula Lombardi
Ontario participants in the February cap-and-trade auction included Suncor Energy Inc., Imperial Oil Ltd, Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., Union Gas Ltd. and Ontario Power Generation. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Take for example the recent Alberta decisions in Ledcor Construction Limited v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Philip Bobbitt
That’s because there would have been nothing of such value to the Americans in a regime change for Libya and Iraq that could have possibly persuaded the U.S. to risk—or suffer—the deaths of millions of people: not oil, not imperial hubris and certainly not a desire to vindicate human rights or develop democracy. [read post]