Search for: "Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The colour orange is not so common in the tobacco industry that Imperial Tobacco may not trademark it. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am by Schachtman
Imperial Tobacco Ltd., [2005] CSOH 69, at ¶ 6.180 (Nimmo Smith, L.J.) [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm by Daniel G.C. Glover
The plaintiffs, Marlboro Canada Ltd. and Imperial Tobacco Ltd., have rights in the trade-mark MARLBORO in Canada dating to the 1920s. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:00 am by Frank Sperduti
No Tax Deduction for Employee Stok Surrender Payments: Update on Imperial Tobacco Case – On May 24, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the taxpayer’s (“Imasco”) leave to appeal application in Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited v. the Queen. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:56 am by David Spiro
Earlier today, the Supreme Court of Canada (The Chief Justice, Justice Rothstein and Justice Moldaver) dismissed an application for leave to appeal by Imperial Tobacco dealing with the classic distinction between deductible corporate expenditures on income account and non-deductible corporate expenditures on capital account. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:07 am by Brandon Kain
The Decision On appeal, the defendants focused on arguing that an implied limitation should be read into the definition of responsible issuer in s. 138.1, so that subsection (b) is limited to “any other issuer with a real and substantial connection to Ontario, any securities of which are publicly traded in Canada“. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:54 am by emagraken
The plaintiff’s claim is grounded in allegations of specific conduct by CMHC concerning the creation of the defective staircase and its negligent inspections. [41] As noted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Imperial Tobacco at para. 47: … where the asserted basis for proximity is grounded in specific conduct and interactions, ruling a claim out at the proximity stage may be difficult. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
Second Strike In R v Imperial Tobacco Limited the defendants made a motion to add Canada as a third-party to British Columbia’s lawsuit. [read post]