Search for: "In Re/In the Matter Of Mark A. Stewart" Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by IMattson
While you might think you're stuck with Justice Potter Stewart's classic definition of obscenity ("I know it when I see it") when the examining attorneys make their decisions, a series of USPTO determinations has recently been collected that give you a more solid understanding of just what kinds of marks have been considered immoral, deceptive, or scandalous.Trademarks Laid Bare: Marks that May be Scandalous or Immoral (available in the… [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:15 pm by Richard M. Re
It's time to talk about what really matters:  the underrated use of exclamation marks in Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:03 pm by Bill Otis
 (If she seeks a live debate with me, that would be another matter).I'm quite sure she is sincere. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Vadamalayan v Stewart and others (2020) UKUT 0183 (LC) The Upper Tribunal (Land Chamber) changes the ground rules on rent repayment orders… Ms Stewart and others were tenants of Mr V. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:17 pm
  We haven’t even reached the five-mile mark, and I’m already worrying about hypothermia. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 9:13 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, entitled “Trump’s Multiple Re-Entry China Policy Vehicles”: Sean Quirk analyzed the latest developments in the South China Sea—including an uptick in Chinese military activity around Taiwan—in this month’s edition of "Water Wars. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:17 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Coming to you from San Francisco where we’re excited to be attending and, with Zosha’s help in Seattle, covering the Legal Marketing Technology Conference West. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:07 am by Stewart Baker
Ignore Trump's corruption allegations because they're just more Russian interference!). [read post]