Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:"
Results 41 - 60
of 62,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm
The recent decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Boxer Capital Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
This is the 2008 opinion by Alex Kozinski that the chapter 13 plan is res judicata even when setting forth rights typically determined by adversary proceeding. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:50 pm
Cir. 2023)Malvern Panalytical Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Applying the doctrine of res judicata Bayer v City of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 02005, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentWhen the employee [Plaintiff] filed a lawsuit alleging that he had been the victim of unlawful discrimination, Supreme Court dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.* The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling.Plaintiff was served with disciplinary pursuant to Civil… [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:19 pm
Container, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2564 In re the marriage of: Ar-Rahmaan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:39 am
In re Overnight Ltd; Goldfarb v Higgins and others; [2009] WLR (D) 49 “The cause of action for fraudulent trading under s 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 arose on the day the winding up order was made and not when either the petition was presented or the provisional liquidator appointed. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:38 am
In Alpine Entertainment Group v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Barrett v Bem; In re Lavin, decd [2012] EWCA Civ 52; [2012] WLR (D) 17 “A court should not find that a will had been signed by a third party at the direction of the testator unless there was positive and discernible communication (which might be verbal or non-verbal) by the testator that he wished the will to be signed on his behalf by the third party.” WLR Daily, 31st January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:37 am
Rottmann v Brittain; In re Rottmann (a bankrupt); [2009] WLR (D) 101 “The court had power to suspend the public examination of a bankrupt pursuant to s 290 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and order the examination to be conducted in private where foreign criminal proceedings had been instituted against the bankrupt. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:50 am
In litigation, the '647 patent survived an invalidity challenge-->Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:27 am
A few more "re-listed" criminal cases for a second consideration by the Supreme Court.Ryan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
In re Paige, 610 F.3d 865, 870–72 (5th Cir. 2010); see also Russell v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
The post Women behind the bar (and the bench): Ginsburg presides over re-enactment of Goesaert v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:05 am
<> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 8:55 pm
Innoven- tion Toys, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:10 am
Lazzarone v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:29 am
In re Asegaai Consultants Ltd and other companies; Wood and another v Mistry [2012] EWHC 1899 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 198 “The court would not exercise its discretion under section 4(1)(b) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to make a disqualification order against a liquidator who had been guilty of any fraud in relation to the company or of any breach of his duty as such liquidator unless serious misconduct had been established. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm
Examples include the dispute between the CCPA (particularly Judge Rich) and the Office in the In re Bergy / In re Chakrabarty cases (dealing with the patent-eligibility of living things), only finally resolved by the Supreme Court's decision contrary to the Office's position in Diamond v. [read post]
