Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:" Results 61 - 80 of 62,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2009, 1:48 am
(my underlining) VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd v BMW Plastics Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 593 '); //--> [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:10 am
Something a bit different - video of the oral argument before the Indiana Supreme Court of In re Paternity of K.I.: J.I. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:15 am
Last Thursday the Ohio Supreme Court, modifing its 2007 holding in State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm by Harold O'Grady
Last month, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Capital Management Select Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:26 am by Jamison Koehler
If the government introduces new evidence during re-direct examination, the defense has a constitutional right to question the witness about that new evidence. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Re (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment? [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Federal district court dismissed Plaintiff's cause of action pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Federal district court dismissed Plaintiff's cause of action pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Online (Forthcoming): The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
Law blogs (or blawgs, if you’re a silly person) are going absolutely nuts over the impending Heller decision. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:44 pm
A couple of weeks ago, in connection with the play "The Battle for the Pentagon Papers," which was being performed at Hancher Auditorium, the law school presented a re-enactment of the Supreme Court oral argument in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ordered [order, DOC] re-argument in Citizens United v. [read post]