Search for: "In Re: Application Chevron, et al, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
EPA, et al. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Donziger, et al., 11 Civ. 0691 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 6:46 am
State of Louisiana, et al., No. 2007-CA-0673, pp. 7-8 (La. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
In re Application of Dr. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., 03-cv-1197 (RCL) (D.D.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:39 pm
In the case of Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm
Travis Abbott et al., No. 23-13(U.S. cert. pending). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Titan Maritime, LLC, et al. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
., et al. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Or perhaps there is some other argument altogether about why the statute should not apply.But I know of at least one instance in which the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation has consolidated multiple judicial assistance applications: In re “Asta Medica, S.A., et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
What the Supreme Court did not do, aside from expressly overruling Auer, et al., is adopt the alternative of Skidmore deference, no greater deference than its persuasive authority warrants. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
Res. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:25 am
If you can find a pattern, you’re ahead of us. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
lanka (Class 46) The beer name no one wants to protect – geographical indication cancellation application (Class 46) PDO costs too high for Höllen Sprudel – another cancellation application (Class 46) FRANDly EU decision in Rambus case (IPEG) Recent EPC rule changes restrict filing of Divisional Applications (Patents4Life) France Tribunal de Grande Instance finds infringement in Evac c.s. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
Judge Rader, joined by Judges Plager and Moore, held that proper application of Section 154(b) entitled Wyeth et al to extended patent term adjustments. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Under federal law, paraquat can be used to control the growth of weeds only “by or under the direct supervision of a certified applicator. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
News & Analysis 11111-11114 (2010).Batker, David, et al. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
However, there is no language expressly limiting its application to Canada. [read post]
