Search for: "In Re: Designating Order v." Results 41 - 60 of 5,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 3:27 am
The wording in a word-plus-design mark is usually accorded greater weight because the literal portion is the part voiced by consumers when ordering the services. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:01 am by Docket Navigator
Fiber Optic Designs, Inc., 2-12-cv-04228 (PAED December 2, 2013, Order) (Goldberg, J.) [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
RBS Citizens, NA, 667 F.3d 900 (7th Cir. 2012) (see my blog post about Ross) and In re Whirlpool Corp. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
For some reason, the Board has re-designated as precedential an interlocutory order in this Section 2(d) opposition involving an application to register the mark RASASVADA for alcohol and spirits. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:37 pm
Thus, it appears that this Order re: Briefing may be a new boilerplate order that Division 5 will issue anytime it appears that less than a full record has been designated. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Amelia Landenberger
Executive orders have been overturned, even by the Supreme Court, as in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Tejinder Singh
If the insured employee wanted the life insurance proceeds to go to the former spouse, then the employee would have to re-designate that person. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If Burstein is right [she is], then they’re no longer applying utility patent standard, which is what they wanted from design right. [read post]