Search for: "In Re: Designating Order v."
Results 81 - 100
of 5,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
(Orin Kerr) Readers will recall that when Glenn Greenwald released the FISC order indicating that the NSA was getting all domestic telephony metadata, that order was designated the “secondary order. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:17 am
You re-marry , maybe get another mortgage or have kids. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:12 am
Honeywell Safety Products USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:10 am
See Kohler Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
I use two languages, sometimes in the same message, and always have to switch between keyboards in order to get the right dictionary. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Becker Designs, Inc., Cancellation No. 92046543 (July 17, 2008) [not precedential].On December 16, 2005, in HBP, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:03 am
[para 24]Secondly, the order provides for the list of target servers to be "re-set" each match week during the Premier League season. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:12 am
[para 24]Secondly, the order provides for the list of target servers to be "re-set" each match week during the Premier League season. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
March 2, 2023 | By: David Ludwig Last month, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark intellectual property ruling in The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:18 pm
Because the New Jersey divorce judge did not conduct a hearing or interview the parties' 15 year-old son, the court reverses the order denying the mother's motion to re-designate her as the parent of primary residence for the son. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
NOC proceedings are designed to result in merely preliminary type findings and are not directed at actual validity/infringement. [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:55 pm
Res. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
The Court has re-read the trial testimony of Dr. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
The Court has re-read the trial testimony of Dr. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:12 am
Poly-America, L.P. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:39 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
Applying this principle, a long line of Appellate Division cases holds that a standing-based dismissal lacks preclusive effect under either res judicata or collateral estoppel: Avilon Automotive Group v Leontiev, 168 AD3d 78 [1st Dept 2019] [“Where a party in an earlier action lacks standing to bring a claim, dismissal will not preclude a subsequent action where the party does have standing, even where both cases arise from the same nucleus of operative facts”];… [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 9:13 pm
and Kartsonas [v. [read post]
