Search for: "In Re: Designating Order v."
Results 121 - 140
of 5,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
Remington Designs, LLC d/b/a iCoffee, 2-16-cv-04676 (CACD June 19, 2018, Order) (Kronstadt, USDJ) [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:46 am
Lassiter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
The National Park Service’s decision to re-open 22.7 miles of trails to off-road vehicle use in Big Cypress National Preserve was illegal, a federal judge in Florida decided today (Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 12:35 pm
(citing In re Carletti, 328 F.2d1020, 1022 (CCPA 1964); Power Controls Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
Mendiola v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:17 am
The justices were cautious at Tuesday morning’s argument in Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 2:50 am
AS Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:11 am
THE WITNESS: The design, like we're divine.THE COURT: Design of what is perfect? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
IT IS SO ORDERED. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:29 am
KGAA v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:07 pm
The court ordered an investigative report be done, which is called an I&R. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:56 am
In the recent case of In re CVR Energy, Inc., the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas was petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to vacate an order denying a party’s motion for leave to designate a recently non-suited defendant as a responsible third party pursuant to Tex. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:58 am
Per Bhojwani v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 12:56 am
Per Bhojwani v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:32 am
Judge Wallace and Judge Lynn (sitting by designation from Texas) are . . . less nice.The district court dismisses a complaint with leave to amend pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), plaintiff fails to amend, and the district court dismisses the lawsuit under Rule 42(b) for "failure to follow a court order".This is clearly an error. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:11 pm
As a result, the state of Florida must now re-issue an accurate death certificate for all individuals who were incorrectly designated unmarried at time of death because their spouses were of the same sex. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:40 pm
IPKat copyright event on 14 March: you can attend in person ...In late 2023, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales issued its judgment in THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
(read the Order here) Armstrong was allowed to re-file an amended complaint within 20 days of the Court’s order- and he did the next day. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
Gustavo GiayOn 26 September 2018, Division II of the Federal Court of Appeals of the City of Buenos Aires issued a decision in “Re adidas AG v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
With respect to design patent damages in Apple v. [read post]
