Search for: "In Re: General Maritime Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2014, 9:27 am
First, as a preliminary matter, the court noted that general maritime law controlled in this action and that neither general common law nor state law would be consulted unless there was an absence of maritime law on an issue to be decided. [read post]
19 May 2010, 9:00 am
See In re Complaint of LADY JANE, INC., 818 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
After discussing the history of punitive damages and maritime law, Judge Robreno reasoned (with internal citations omitted, and emphasis added): Having concluded that maritime law does not impose a general bar on punitive damages in unseaworthiness claims, the Court turns to the question of whether punitive damages are appropriate when such claims arise in the context of asbestos cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
ProsecutorsOntario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
‘This is really just saying when you’re going to put information out there in the public domain, we need to make sure that everyone’s playing with the same rules and everyone interprets things the same way. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:06 pm
Unfortunately, there will be additional crew deaths as a result of the cruise lines devoting their depleting liquidity to re-start their operations. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Consequently, maritime law under compensates the surviving families of seamen and those killed in high seas maritime tort disasters. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Kona Blue Water Farms, LLC, 2010 WL 3566731, the United States District Court in Hawaii ruled that punitive damages are available under the general maritime law claims of unseaworthiness, citing the Ninth Court of Appeals’ decision in Evich v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
Starting in 1964, Johns-Manville Corporation, the major manufacturer of asbestos-containing insulation, started warning. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
This arrangement is clearly superior to the murky present situation, which leaves it to general counsels of corporations (and in some cases their top management) to navigate the uncertain application of numerous laws based on risk appetites and defensive needs. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Roaring Toyz (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB ruling in ML skin care products case: In re Mighty Leaf Tea (precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CGL, finding transportation of natural gas related to freight forwarding: In re SeaOne Maritime Corp. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:55 am
The final rule generally uses the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 10:52 pm
However, the actual connection requirement does not apply to Chinese maritime jurisdiction when China has no actual relation with the maritime disputes. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 1:12 pm
The decedent’s widow filed a claim in that action alleging four counts under the Jones Act for negligence and four counts under the general maritime law for unseaworthiness. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
Handl, In Re South African Apartheid Litigation and Beyond: Corporate Liability for Aiding and Abetting Under the Alien Tort StatuteK. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
Pirates formed a loose confederation of maritime bandits outside the law of any government. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:34 pm
Both companies are essentially saying “trust us, we’re looking into it. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm
Nubodys Fitness Centres involved an employee who had a corporate membership in a gym that disclosed the frequency of visits to the employer. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:17 pm
It provided, as a general rule, that publicly traded partnerships would be treated as corporations. [read post]
