Search for: "In Re: Habeas Application v."
Results 1 - 20
of 511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Swain v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
As I note in the column, ludicrous as this sounds, it's the position staked out by Justice Scalia (for himself, Rehnquist and Thomas) in INS v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am
Allen in 1953 and permitted federal courts to re-adjudicate state prisoners’ post-conviction constitutional claims. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
If you're convicted of a crime in state court, you can challenge the constitutionality of your conviction in federal court through a habeas corpus petition. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:26 am
ShareIn Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
British ways of thinking left their mark on the Constitution’s habeas suspension clause and on the clause’s application in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:03 pm
The Sixth Circuit continued that trend in Wright v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
’ In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 (1970). [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
June 19, 2007):The Court is aware that two Federal Appellate Courts have issued published opinions treating the movants' Rule 59(e) motions as successive applications for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
As I’ve written previously, such a ruling, at the very least, re-opens the doors to pre-trial habeas challenges by military commission defendants. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:35 am
Check the Magwood v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Mitts, 10-1000, a twice-relisted capital case involving the grant of habeas relief on the same jury instruction the Court upheld last term in Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:27 am
” In re Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:27 am
” In re Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
Webster v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:54 am
Thanks to Montgomery v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
If the state court denied on the merits, the federal court would re-examine the merits from scratch. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Per Jasper v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 6:17 am
V, Sec. 4) permits a panel of three CCA judges to consider habeas writs, but not individual judges as is this court's practice. [read post]
