Search for: "In Re: Habeas Application v."
Results 21 - 40
of 511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:53 pm
In Trevino v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:38 pm
Per Cohen v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
(Defendants usually file for federal habeas corpus review after they're convicted and sentenced to death in state court. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm
Several Northern District of California judges have recently released orders in civil rights cases and petitions for habeas corpus, among them: In Bolbol v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm
This case therefore involves the fuzzy intersection of the purpose of the exclusionary rule and the retroactive application of new Fourth Amendment case law per United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:26 pm
Canada (Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness), 2018 ONCA 681 [26] The question regarding any issue in immigration habeas corpus matters, other than in the case of lengthy detentions of uncertain duration, will be, whether there is a complete, comprehensive and expert alternative remedy that is as broad and advantageous as a habeas corpus application: Chhina v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 ABCA 248 (CanLII), 56 Alta. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Clair, 10-1265, the State of California seeks review of the Ninth Circuit’s grant of habeas relief to a capital defendant; the Ninth Circuit held that a district court abused its discretion in denying the writ where a federal habeas petitioner had objected to the performance of his appointed federal habeas counsel and demanded substitute counsel. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm
Even if Kiyemba were applicable, the current panel is bound by the opinions of the D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:21 pm
Khela filed a habeas corpus application at the provincial superior court challenging his transfer on grounds that proper procedure had not been followed. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
ShareThe court heard argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
Farley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
It’s bad news if you’re not a fan of prison litigation. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:38 am
Per Belot v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:48 am
Therefore, it is not the duty of the civil courts to re-examine and re-weigh each item of evidence or events which tend to prove or disprove one of the allegations in the applications for habeas corpus. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:07 am
This is one application of the maxim that equity acts in personam. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 8:47 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
