Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
They’re drafted in odd ways that probably miss their intended targets. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
A cautionary note about raising tribal immunity from a federal subpoena: For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the subpoena duces tecum was unenforceable after the expiration of the issuing grand jury. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
FricosuU.S. v Doe (In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011)Share this: || Join EFF [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
Similarly, in re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that decryption and production of a hard drive's content triggered the protection of the Fifth Amendment because it would be testimonial. 670 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm
On its face, Section 215 is the authority that is primarily about obtaining physical objects, which would be analogized to the criminal law authority for a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
A case that comes to mind is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Nov. 15, 1993, 846 F.Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (Mukasey, J.). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
If we indulge the assumption that the investigation is tied to some grand jury inquiry (likely in most, though not all scenarios) then resistance to a valid subpoena is quite hard. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
Last year, in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum,670 F.3d 1335 (U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
But when the Jihadis walked right through “law enforcement” and blew up downtown that bright fall day, they blew up much of what the remained debatable in the debate about privacy and technology — or, at least, so it seemed, until a year ago, when the 11th Circuit issued an important ruling in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, summarized here by Joel Hruska: [A] John Doe . . . was compelled… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
There, a grand jury served a subpoena duces tecum on a non-party purporting to require the non-party to create and produce a list of the names of persons it employed during a particular time period. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
CCRP 101 Abolition of coroner’s jury and inquest; investigation by coroner CCRP 102 Autopsy CCRP 103 Subpoena of witnesses; testimony; subpoena duces tecum; issuance CCRP 104 Employment of expert assistants CCRP 105 Coroner’s report; admissibility in evidence CCRP 106 Arrest of criminal suspect CCRP 131 Duties and powers CCRP 161 Property subject to seizure CCRP 162 Issuance of warrant; affidavit; description CCRP 162.1… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:27 pm
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 2012 U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
The 11th Circuit just decided In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum March 25, 2011, USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
The Eleventh Circuit held, today, that a person cannot be compelled to unencrypt encrypted files under the Fifth Amendment in In re Subpoena Duces Tecum issued March 25, 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
., for instance, asked Verrilli if the government could criminalize lying about whether one received a high school diploma.In other news, the 11th Circuit came out with a fascinating opinion today (In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011 USA v. [read post]
