Search for: "In Re Marriage of Case"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2008, 12:59 pm
Pizer and her co-counsel, including Oakland appellate specialist Jon Eisenberg, contend in the brief filed Monday that last Thursday's ruling in In re Marriage Cases, 08 C.D.O.S. 5820, makes it clear that gays and lesbians are citizens with constitutional rights and, by extension, cannot be denied essential medical services, including infertility care. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
The June 17, 2020 South Carolina Supreme Court case of In Re Estate of Brown appears to finally resolve the estate of the “Hardest Working Man in Show Business,” a/k/a “The Godfather of Soul,” a/k/a “Soul Brother #1. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
We’re not bigots. [read post]
16 May 2008, 4:39 am
In the case of In re Marriage Cases decided May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court held in a 4-3 opinion that two state laws that had limited marriages to opposite-sex partners are unconstititional and held that single-sex couples have... [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
I focus here on plural marriage. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
If I had a bit more time to indulge my historical curiosity, I think I would go looking for two cases: Stoner v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:25 pm
" (Ibid., citing In re Marriage of Martin (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1196, 1200.) [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:09 am
Meghan McCalla (Article Editor, Estate Planning & Community Property Law Journal) has recently published her comment entitled The "Socially Endorsed, Legally Framed, Normative Template": What Has In re Marriage Cases Really Done for Same-Sex Marriage? [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:48 pm
The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in In re Marriage Cases, which challenges the constitutionality of state laws that discriminate against same-sex couples in marriage. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm
While the Respect for Marriage Act will guarantee federal recognition of same-sex and interracial marriages, it also serves as a fail-safe in case the Supreme Court overturns its prior decisions. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:19 am
To read a court case that provides a simple, excellent explanation of the requirements of common law marriage in Oklahoma, see In re Phifer’s Estate, available here. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
Maybe they're poor. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
The case included a lengthy discussion regarding weight of the evidence issues and the procedure for filing exceptions.You can read the full opinion here: In re: Estate of William O. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:23 am
This recent case may affect future cases in McLean County Divorces. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:27 am
I've just finished reading the California Supreme Court's decision in In re Marriage Cases (whew! [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
Redeeming the dream: the case for marriage equality. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:04 pm
Related blog posts: Untangling Shared Business Interests in California Divorce Cases – In re Marriage of Greaux and Mermin The Role of Retirement Benefits in California Divorce Cases – In re Marriage of Green Bankruptcy, Divorce and Community Property – In re Marriage of Rynda [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:04 pm
Related blog posts: Untangling Shared Business Interests in California Divorce Cases – In re Marriage of Greaux and Mermin The Role of Retirement Benefits in California Divorce Cases – In re Marriage of Green Bankruptcy, Divorce and Community Property – In re Marriage of Rynda [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:18 am
The California Supreme Court's May 15 ruling [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] in In re Marriage Cases [case materials] overturned a ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 1:46 pm
It's a somewhat complicated issue involving how you split (1) separate property owned by one spouse before the marriage, (2) in which the community (during the marriage) pays part of the mortgage, and (3) the owning spouse lives in the property after the date of the separation.There's a fairly clear answer already to (1) and (2). [read post]
