Search for: "In re: Prempro Products Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm
In 2020, in the In re: Robinhood Outage Litigation, the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
The legislature chose not to punish FDA-regulated activity, but the court nullified that legislative decision, with practically no discussion.In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation, 804 F.3d 633 (3d Cir. 2015). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
In fact, product liability law often follows a “needs of the many” approach that supports research, development, and limitation of liability for prescription medical products, where large damage awards can occur in the Wink of an Eye and can result in The Doomsday Machine for such products. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
First filed in 2003, the case was transferred to the In re Prempro MDL, where the MDL judge denied the plaintiff’s motion to certify a class of California patients asserting claims for consumer fraud. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
We thought we’d take a look at what law exists concerning the intersection of pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, and prescription medical product liability litigation. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, reporters notes to comment l (1998). [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
June 22, 2010); In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 554 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:13 pm
In products liability litigation, the parties are typically not assigned a burden of proving the absence of causation. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 649 F. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
See In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 591 F.3d 613 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am
Contact Lens Solution Products Liability Litigation (no website)MDL-1836 IN RE Mirapex Products Liability Litigation But, some are still going strong and may well continue to generate law that we report on here:MDL-1355 IN RE Propulsid Products Liability Litigation MDL-1507 IN RE Prempro Products Liability Litigation MDL-1789 IN RE Fosamax… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
We especially like decisions that reject use of res ipsa loquitur as an end run around the defect (and sometimes causation) requirement of product liability. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
It’s not that I haven’t noticed you folks over at Weil Gotshal with your competing Product Liability Monitor (link nofollowed), but you need to add some hot sauce and link out if you want to roll with the big boys. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Like all prescription products, PROPECIA may cause side effects. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 514 F.3d 825, 829-30 (8th Cir. 2008); Treuchel v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
In In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 554 F. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:51 pm
Here is a the opinion: In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1507, slip op. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
See In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 514 F.3d 825, 830 (8th Cir. 2008); Thom v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:35 am
The former are more common than the latter, but there's still a significant number of estrogen-only cases.At least there were before In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 4:03-CV-1507-WRW, slip op. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Alleged negligent failure to test could not be causal when all product liability claims dismissed. [read post]
