Search for: "In re: Robert J. Grant" Results 1 - 20 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge April Wood, joined by Judges Donna Stroud and Jefferson Griffin: Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment for Defendant and dismissing all their claims arising out of Defendant's Executive Order No. 141 issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm by Jacob Fishman
., Law Through the Eyes of Animals in Animals as Experiencing Entities (Michael J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Some of the first remanded cases went to the District of Oregon, where they landed in front of Judge Robert E. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Roberts, who heads up the Philadelphia County mass tort court, provided that: AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Clarify the Court’s January 4, 2024 Order on Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Foreign Regulatory Registrations and/or Approvals of Glyphosate, GBHs, and/or Roundup, Plaintiffs’ Response, and after oral argument, it is ORDERED as follows: The Court’s Order of January 4, 2024, is AMENDED to… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Richard J. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The text of the percuriam and the two opinions (Barrett, J., and Sotomayer, J.) follow. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
One such problem is that the Respondents' theory would render unconstitutional every Speaker and President Pro Tempore since 1789, as well President Grant's Vice President and Presidential Candidate George McGovern. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
In the district court, a careful judge excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, who relied heavily upon animal studies and who cherry picked and distorted the available epidemiology.[9] The Court of Appeals reversed, in an unsigned, non-substantive opinion that interjected an asymmetric standard of review.[10] After granting review, the Supreme Court engaged with the substantive validity issues passed over by the intermediate appellate court. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather than setting cases for re-argument, the Court 4-4'd cases including Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In this re-hearing of the Appellant’s appeal, the court had to decide whether the FOI request was lawfully denied. 5RB summa [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]