Search for: "In re: Westwood Plaza North" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
Today's published opinion in In re Westwood Plaza North, is a per curiam opinion from this month's motions panel, holding that the FRAP 38 motion for sanctions (for pursuing a frivolous appeal) was timely because it was filed within the time for seeking fees (under 9th Circuit rule 39-1.6(a)), i.e., 14 days after the time for a rehearing petition or after the court's disposition of a rehearing petition. [read post]